microwave calculators noise figure

microwave RF information for engineers encyclopedia calculators tools

skin depth cpw calculator pin diode

directional coupler smith chart microwave dictionary

July 20, 2018
phased array frequency meter

microwave jobs career recruiting antennas twitter

bandwidth microwave measurements

noise figure phase shifter microwave encyclopedia

s parameters waveguide variable attenuator acronyms

internet of things ios attenuator calculator

RF trace simulation in ADS

More
2 years 7 months ago #442 by Giftina
Giftina created the topic: RF trace simulation in ADS
We are trying to simulate 42mm RF trace at 77GHz in ADS. The values that were obtained for return loss were +6.4 dB. But when the same trace was simulated for a length of 25mm, we are getting good return loss (-17 dB). We are using CPWG structure for RF traces. Is there any relation between the length of RF trace and return loss? Kindly let us know if there is any possible way to eliminate this. Thank you.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 7 months ago - 2 years 7 months ago #443 by madengr
madengr replied the topic: RF trace simulation in ADS
1) Is that return loss or |S11|? For a passive circuit, return loss is positive and |S11| is negative. If it is going positive to negative you have something fundamentally wrong with your simulation.

2) I assume this is EM simulation in Momentum? I don't use ADS, but maybe there are equivalents of Microwave Office's port impedance and passivity; check those. You have to be careful for port setup of CPWG. Typically the ground ports are "negative numbered" and of course you need two of them to evenly split the current. What do the currents look like? Do you have a proper mesh? Do the results converge as the mesh density is increased?

3) Finally, return loss does vary with electrical length. That's a fundamental property of a transmission line that is not exactly terminated with it's characteristic impedance. You can also have dispersion, but again I think you have something fundamentally wrong.
Last Edit: 2 years 7 months ago by madengr.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 7 months ago #444 by Dave
Dave replied the topic: RF trace simulation in ADS
To add a point to Madengr's list

4) As well as port setup, be careful with via and/or ground strap spacing in the EM simulation; spacing relative to each other and distance from the first strap/vias to the ports can cause unexpected resonances in the result.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 7 months ago #445 by Giftina
Giftina replied the topic: RF trace simulation in ADS
Thank you Madengr.
1.It is the S11 parameter.
2. It is the mometum simulation in ADS. We are getting proper S11 and S21 when the length of the RF trace is within 25mm. But if we increase the length beyound 25 mm, we are facing this issue. We are having two adjacent ground and one bottom ground and they are defined as negative in the port setup.Current distibution is as shown in the attachment. I have taken this snapshot from momentum visualization window. Mesh formed takes the colour of the ground conductor. Cells/Wavelength is 20 for this simulation.
3. These results are obtained from the layout simulation. Is it required to terminate it with 50 ohm in schematics?
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 7 months ago #446 by Giftina
Giftina replied the topic: RF trace simulation in ADS
Thank you Dave.
Is there any specification or formula to calculate the distance of the pin to the first via?
We have maintained a constant spacing between vias in this simulation.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
2 years 7 months ago #447 by Dave
Dave replied the topic: RF trace simulation in ADS
I don't know of any specific formulas for the distance from pin to first via. There might be some - check out Coplanar Waveguides and Circuits by Rainee N Simons. I haven't read it, but it's on the MW101 recommended books page: www.microwaves101.com/encyclopedias/book...icrowave-engineering I suspect in reality most people just treat it as an EM optimisation problem.

In the screenshot you posted, what's the dielectric constant and what's the line length? 77 GHz in free space is 3.9 mm, shorter once you take into account dielectric constant and filling factor, and I think you'll want the ground vias to be closer than that. Lambda/10 is a good rule of thumb at lower frequencies but almost impossible to fabricate at mm-wave.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.184 seconds
mobile app designers california